<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Global Warming Week-in-Review 04/20/2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.skepticsglobalwarming.com/global-warming-myth/commentary/global-warming-week-in-review-04202008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.skepticsglobalwarming.com/global-warming-myth/commentary/global-warming-week-in-review-04202008/</link>
	<description>Fueled by a Healthy Skepticism of Anthropogenic Global Warming</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Earl E</title>
		<link>http://www.skepticsglobalwarming.com/global-warming-myth/commentary/global-warming-week-in-review-04202008/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>Earl E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 21:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.skepticsglobalwarming.com/?p=549#comment-294</guid>
		<description>Why would I care about an individual changing his mind on hurricanes. From my reading 2 years ago, a link between earth warming and hurricanes was not proven. Since science is always changing, more data feeds new science, I don't lend much to speculation one way or another.

If it is 102 degrees in the middle of a parking lot, and 84 degrees upwind of the lot, and 93 degrees downwind of the lot, what is the temperature?

The fact that it is 102 dergrees over the parking lot is absolute proof that the added cement and blacktop made the area under measurement warmer. This proves man increased the warming in this region by putting in the parking lot.

And I don't need to call anyone else's scientific analysis bunk, or try and say it disproves anything, I just have to admit the parkijg lot contributed to increased warming in the area.

Now multiply that by all of the buildings and roads we constructed, and it increases warming more than if it were trees and grasses. If you don't see that, then you are part of the problem.

If man can poison a river with a teaspoon full of some biologic, and another man can destroy the Mississippi river fish habitat by mistakenly freeing all of his chinese carp, I am not going to say that 200 million cows emmitting methane gas couldn't impact the thin layer of atmosphere.

But you seem to have fun attacking Al Gore, that is so 2004. Global dimming and climate destabilization are the new science, its about particulate pollution, rainfall patterns, and desalinization of the oceans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would I care about an individual changing his mind on hurricanes. From my reading 2 years ago, a link between earth warming and hurricanes was not proven. Since science is always changing, more data feeds new science, I don&#8217;t lend much to speculation one way or another.</p>
<p>If it is 102 degrees in the middle of a parking lot, and 84 degrees upwind of the lot, and 93 degrees downwind of the lot, what is the temperature?</p>
<p>The fact that it is 102 dergrees over the parking lot is absolute proof that the added cement and blacktop made the area under measurement warmer. This proves man increased the warming in this region by putting in the parking lot.</p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t need to call anyone else&#8217;s scientific analysis bunk, or try and say it disproves anything, I just have to admit the parkijg lot contributed to increased warming in the area.</p>
<p>Now multiply that by all of the buildings and roads we constructed, and it increases warming more than if it were trees and grasses. If you don&#8217;t see that, then you are part of the problem.</p>
<p>If man can poison a river with a teaspoon full of some biologic, and another man can destroy the Mississippi river fish habitat by mistakenly freeing all of his chinese carp, I am not going to say that 200 million cows emmitting methane gas couldn&#8217;t impact the thin layer of atmosphere.</p>
<p>But you seem to have fun attacking Al Gore, that is so 2004. Global dimming and climate destabilization are the new science, its about particulate pollution, rainfall patterns, and desalinization of the oceans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
