(Via The Atlantic). The Economist is proposing planetary-scale changes to combat global warming.  This terraforming could involve removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere or injecting sulphur into the upper atmosphere to block out some of the sun’s energy to cool the planet.  While I’m sure this would require a great percentage of the world’s GDP to accomplish, what happens if, like now, the planet is in a cooling phase?  How much more money and effort would be expended to correct that problem?

Read More: www.economist.com

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it, about it,
subscribe to my RSS Feed in your reader or
subscribe to my RSS Feed by email.
Or you can follow me on Twitter.
Tags: Atlantic, Science, cooling, carbon, atmosphere

• Six Questions to Ask A Global Warming Hoaxer (0)
• Rebuttal of Al Gore’s NY Times Editorial (0)
• Global Warming Week-in-Review 5/25/2008 (0)
• Global Warming Hoax Week-in-Review 06/15/2008 (0)
• Where’s the “Science” in the “Scientific Consensus”? (0)