In an upcoming edition of Science Magazine, the debate over which was first - a spike in carbon dioxide or a spike in temperatures - is examined.  Ocean currents are also studied to see how they can be predictors of climate change.  Historical looks at Greenland temperature increases are also included in the article, which show that increases in temperature were preceded by increases in carbon dioxide two to four thousand years in the past.  So does this mean we have another couple of thousand years to wait before global warming sets in?

Read More: arstechnica.com

Did you like this? If so, please bookmark it, about it,
subscribe to my RSS Feed in your reader or
subscribe to my RSS Feed by email.
Or you can follow me on Twitter.
Tags: carbon dioxide, temperature, Science, global warming, green

• Part II: Ten Questions with A Climate Crisis A La Gore Author Paul Spite (9)
• Global Warming Hoax: A Skeptical Beginner’s Guide, Part I (4)
• Global Warming Hoax Week-in-Review 06/15/2008 (0)
• Where’s the “Science” in the “Scientific Consensus”? (0)
• Six Questions to Ask A Global Warming Hoaxer (0)