Climate Change not as Profitable as it Used to Be

Wednesday, November 12, 2008, 9:56
Print This Post
Email This Post

Photo courtesy kangotraveler.

The Al Gore co-founded “Current TV” television broadcast network laid off 60 staff members last night and released a statement that the network would use more viewer-generated content, giving its audience a greater opportunity for participation. Sounds like Gore is going with the free labor approach rather than paying someone for their work.

About the Author

Skeptic has written 1661 stories on this site.

A social and fiscal conservative, I scour the news for information that disputes the current man-made global warming indoctrination that takes place around the world. I take a rather sarcastic approach to reporting on the nonsense being spewed by the talking heads in the media and the governments around the world.

5 Comments on “Climate Change not as Profitable as it Used to Be”

Robert D wrote on 12 November, 2008, 13:50
And on that note, did you see where the government told some scientists to wrap it up and move along? There may be some hope for us after all.
Gov’t to GW Scientists: Wrap it up

Just another ten million…..Follow The Money!
Skeptic wrote on 12 November, 2008, 17:14
Great link, Robert. I just now saw that article on your site. I guess a consensus may not exist after all.
Robert D wrote on 12 November, 2008, 19:02
Thanks skeptic. After posting that I started thinking.(usually gets me nowhere) but just what were they hoping to prove by giving enormous amounts of CO2 to trees? That GW would make them grow bigger and better? Crops would grow better if we did have more CO2? That’s like putting more oxygen in the air and saying it will harm people. There’s $55 million wasted, and they wanted another $10 million…..
Skeptic wrote on 12 November, 2008, 19:05
There is so much money wasted on global warming. $55 million is just a drop in the bucket. Crops would grow better with more CO2. And if the greens would just realize that CO2 doesn’t drive temperature, we’d be a whole lot better off.
Robert D wrote on 12 November, 2008, 19:23
Yep, I agree.